Radioactive dating archeology

Through a faulty calibration scale, the study argues, organic carbon-14 evidence linking archaeological sites to the Israelite period may have been given false early dates.

This new proposed calculations would cause their “biblical” ties to be much less certain.

Manning, the Goldwin Smith Professor of Classical Archaeology in the Department of Classics and director of the Cornell Tree-Ring Laboratory, gives a qualified answer.

radioactive dating archeology-66

“If anyone does a radiocarbon age measurement on an unknown-date sample – like for example some grains from an archaeological site in Israel – whether run at the Weizmann Lab [in Rehovot] or Zurich or Oxford or Arizona or wherever – then to get a calendar age they use the standard international radiocarbon calibration curve – i.e.

Int Cal13,” Manning elaborates in an email exchange with The Times of Israel.

In the study, he extrapolates that in even more ancient periods, it could vary even more significantly.

“Over the three centuries for which we have data at present the ‘average’ is around 20 years.

Radiocarbon testing was developed as a tool for archaeologists to date ancient organic material in the wake of World War II, by an American former Manhattan Project scientist, physicist Willard Libby.

Essentially, when radioactive atmospheric rays hit nitrogen in the atmosphere, their love child is radiocarbon.

When the flora or the fauna die, the C-14 also begins to decay.

The smaller the amount of C-14, the older the sample.

“If you can use dendrochronology [tree-ring dating] directly, then you have an absolute date.” Combining the use of tree-ring dating with radiocarbon testing, creates accuracy of within a few years, he says, citing a project his lab and colleagues undertook in placing Mesopotamian Middle Bronze Age chronology.

Tags: , ,