In other words, it had many of the features of a real government.
On the other hand, he wrote, the status of the Taliban was much more complex, and their potential designation as prisoners of war would have to be determined on a case by case basis.
This stemmed from the different roles of the two groups: Al-Qaeda, whatever its role inside Afghanistan, could not be deemed a legitimate government. objective of ensuring its forces are accorded protection under the [Geneva] Conventions.”, as Bergdahl was, to be prisoners of war.
(The fact that six soldiers had already died in efforts to find Bergdahl does, however, raise the question of how many American servicemen have to lose their lives because of legal complexities created by this nature of warfare.)United States Army personnel are expected to live under the standards established by what is known as the Soldier’s Creed, a collection of 13 sentences that are considered so significant that they are required knowledge for any soldier seeking a promotion to sergeant or above.
When the words are recited—which is often—soldiers stand at attention in honor of its meaning.
“This is a conflict without battlefields and or beachheads.”Among the issues that made the confrontation different was that this would be a war not against a foreign state, but against a faction of Afghan leaders—the Taliban—which was providing material support to the terrorist organization, Al-Qaeda.
The Taliban controlled about 90 percent of the territory in Afghanistan and in 1996 proclaimed itself to be the ruling government and its founder, Mullah Mohammed Omar, as the country’s leader.
Throughout American history, there have been two means of honoring that commitment by and to the military: armed rescue and negotiations. In other words, should soldiers be instructed that, because the wars undertaken since 9/11 are not being fought against traditional nation-states, they can only be saved if captured as POWs as part of an armed rescue?
Some politicians are already saying they would have used military force to save Bergdahl, but that is quite a naïve commitment.
Does the American military still back the “no soldier left behind” doctrine? Does this instance constitute “negotiating with terrorists” or something more complex? And finally, who are the prisoners in this instance and does it matter what they did? Bush made clear that the American response would entail something far different from what had ever been attempted in the past.
“This will be a different kind of conflict against a different kind of enemy,” he said in a radio address on September 15, 2001.
The United States proclaimed such a commitment would require the Taliban to turn over Osama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda leader.Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating